JAMA Goes MAHA
Reading Between the Lines
When Pravda was at the peak of its propagandistic powers, you couldn’t find a word of truth in its pages. If you looked closer, however, and read between the lines, you could learn quite a lot. A certain Politburo official, who used to be praised, hasn’t been mentioned in the paper for a few days? He’s been shipped off to Siberia. The paper suddenly starts denouncing an “anti-Soviet” lie? Well now you know it must be true.
With that Kremlinologist spirit in mind, I found the latest output from JAMA quite interesting. For my new readers (welcome, and thank you!), a brief refresher. The Journal of the American Medical Association is a prestigious and thoroughly twisted mouthpiece for establishment madness: it has supported stripping the licenses of any doctors who were right about Covid (aka purveyors of what JAMA calls “misinformation”) while at the same time and in the very same issue it celebrated the sinister lie of “gender affirmation”; it has called for making it even easier to mutilate and irreversibly sterilize children, while alerting the world to what it perceives as the real danger: Christian doctors; it celebrates killing the untermensch; and it really, really, really likes killing babies.
With that background in mind, imagine my surprise upon receiving the latest edition of their weekly digest. No, they didn’t walk back their dystopian censorship plans or their calls for breastbinding local preteens. But look closely and you might talk yourself into seeing that the new administration is having an effect already…
One top article: a study showing increasing fluoride in the water supply leads to falling IQ levels. This is the sort of topic that was considered such outright quackery that it was reserved for Stanley Kubrick parodies. Now it is featured in the home of the medical elite.
But wait, there’s more: a randomized controlled study that shows two month vaccines given to premature babies more than double their incidents of apnea (the medical term for “forgetting to breathe”). True, the study authors argue this is in no way a reason to avoid vaccines, because apneic events are no big deal at all and not a reason to avoid vaccination (I wonder why, then, they even bothered with the study? Perhaps hoping for a different outcome?). Yet all their throat-clearing cannot hide their own RCT results.
Perhaps I’m imagining it, but somehow I doubt that such controversial takes on fluoride and vaccines would be published by JAMA if it were President Harris being inaugurated next week. Combine these studies with the news that - 30 years after it was banned from cosmetics - the FDA this week is finally banning petroleum-derived red dye in our food supply.
The signs may be subtle, but read between the lines and it seems that even before RFK Jr. moves in, the medical establishment is signalling that MAHA is coming…
Stay tuned!
JAMA isn't worth reading and only exists because of funding from the AMA, which naive new doctors feel compelled to join. After some time in practice, these doctors realize the AMA doesn't represent their interests at all and JAMA is filled with junk science.
If only research was based on true science and free from manipulation and bias and bribery from paid advertising which has no place in medicine or scientific research. let truth in results speak for themselves and questions resume which shape and sharpen.